Sep. 14th, 2004

gordonzola: (Default)
I haven't been around and it seems like eveyone had one. Happy Birthday [livejournal.com profile] psoup, [livejournal.com profile] vestalvixen, [livejournal.com profile] superchones, [livejournal.com profile] final_girl, [livejournal.com profile] jette and [livejournal.com profile] cindymonkey who all had birthdays this last weekend.

Whoo hoo!

Did I miss anyone?
gordonzola: (Default)
So the Bay Area Worker Cooperative Conference and Festival was a success. Almost 190 registrants by the time it was done. A 3-day film fest and a weekend-long conference with 20 workshops was an ambitious thing to organize with a volunteer group that started with five of us.

But I like to dwell on the negative. I’m that type of person. I feel like I learned a lot about putting on a conference in an urban location. I have a lot of experience with organizing destination-conferences, but doing something in a city has unique challenges. Like, if it’s boring, people have the choice to leave.

I like thinking big. It’s a problem with the left that no one thinks big enough. But we definitely bit off more than we could chew with this thing and it became obvious a couple weeks ago. So I went into my panic/stress/work-all-the-time mode which is my usual defense mechanism. We pulled it off, but I think every individual part of the conference could have been improved if we had more time to concentrate on it. A one-day conference instead of a two-day one, one night time event instead two, a day of movies or a series NOT on the three days immediately leading up to the main events.

Then again, it would have been helpful to not schedule myself to facilitate two workshops, be a panelist on another, interview an author for a night time event and have my "band" perform at the auction. I have a hard time saying "no" sometimes.

Again, overall it was really good but a couple of things prevented it from being the obvious, momentum-building event I had hoped for. I think the biggest reason was the location. The Women’s Building was great to us. They gave us a nice discount and were the most helpful event hosts I’ve ever met in ten years of sporadically putting on shows and conferences. Having childcare on site was also one of the biggest positive evaluation comments we received, enabling people to participate who wouldn’t have been able to otherwise.

But man, that main auditorium is BIG. At the opening introduction, I kept feeling, "No one is here. This is gonna be a disaster." Then I counted the people. 80 people gathered around on 10 AM on Saturday morning to talk about co-ops. That should have been easily recognizable as a victory. If the same number of us had been crammed into a classroom everyone would have been all, "This is so great to see this many people here" instead of "Where is everyone?" It’s a basic organizing rule, but we had forgotten it.

My only Women’s Building complaint is that the Audre Lorde room has horrible acoustics. Like, if someone scoots their chair you miss what is said. Combine that with the murmur of constant simultaneous translation and a workshop can get pretty frustrating and exhausting just from struggling to hear what is said.

Since one can not hold a public event in the Bay Area without wingnuts, we had a good one show up. Luckily he was dealt with what one participant described as a "surgical strike" of facilitation. Evidently, he drove all the way from Sonoma to attend the "Co-ops and Labor Unions" discussion and interrupt with a sermon about the evilness of unions, the atrocity of eating animal flesh, the meaning of [livejournal.com profile] anarqueso’s shirt, cleansing the world of usurers, and a few other topics. When finally made to stop speaking, the facilitator said, "Do you have an actual question?"

"Do you have a question?" he replied.

Momentarily stumped, the facilitator said, "Ok, you’ve had your say. You can sit quietly for the rest of the workshop or you can leave."

He got up to leave and said, "Thank you. You’ve been very polite." Obviously he was used to getting thrown out of these things. Maybe it was performance art.

Addendumb

Sep. 14th, 2004 10:47 am
gordonzola: (Default)
Oh geez. I messed up the punchline of my last entry. After the religious nut left, the facilitator said to the group, "If there are any other wingnuts in this workshop, will you please self-identify right now?"

Badda-boom.
gordonzola: (Default)
OK folks, it’s definition time. Who would like to posit a definition for "wingnut" as it applies to a certain type of politico?

Here’s mine:

Wingnut: A person who has their mental health issues so intertwined with their "politics" that to them there is no difference. Paranoia, conspiracy theory, and poor social skills are necessary traits. In addition, ineffectiveness and failure are usually treated as signs that the Revolution is somehow coming closer to happening. The term originated in People’s Park, Berkeley, California and is usually used by slightly embarrassed anarchists and anti-authoritarians to distance themselves from "wingnut’ politics and activists who may also identify with those terms.

Sample sentence: Did you see the wingnuts protesting the "execution" of Rosebud Denovo when the cops shot her for breaking into the chancellor’s home with a machete?

Please feel free to add your own definitions or ask if someone you know fits the definition.

Profile

gordonzola: (Default)
gordonzola

June 2019

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 29
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 03:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios