I don't think he has defended the FBI, except as a rhetorical statement.
His politics are not my politics. He's an old school type of newspaper editor, hammering a point or an agenda until something happens. But I don't really understand why people are so upset that he wants to figure out what happened. I think it has historical importance, possibly in a much bigger way than false arrest charges do. What if there was FBI complicity (with the husband or whoever)? Isn't that important to the left? To prove it rather than just imply it to each other?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-01-26 11:09 pm (UTC)His politics are not my politics. He's an old school type of newspaper editor, hammering a point or an agenda until something happens. But I don't really understand why people are so upset that he wants to figure out what happened. I think it has historical importance, possibly in a much bigger way than false arrest charges do. What if there was FBI complicity (with the husband or whoever)? Isn't that important to the left? To prove it rather than just imply it to each other?