gordonzola (
gordonzola) wrote2006-08-28 09:12 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Dear Pluto fetishists,
WTF? No one knocked it out of the sky. It's still there. It can still be your favorite interstellar object even if it's not a planet.
As I said in a comment elsewhere, it's like being upset that evolution is (mostly) being taught in school or that Drake's Plate is now taught to be a fraud (which was a big issue when I was in grade school). I am fully willing to let scientists in that field decide on the definition of planets and do not feel like it should be up to popular vote.
It's not like science doesn't have an agenda at times. But it's hard to find one here beyond having a reasonable definition to work with.
As I said in a comment elsewhere, it's like being upset that evolution is (mostly) being taught in school or that Drake's Plate is now taught to be a fraud (which was a big issue when I was in grade school). I am fully willing to let scientists in that field decide on the definition of planets and do not feel like it should be up to popular vote.
It's not like science doesn't have an agenda at times. But it's hard to find one here beyond having a reasonable definition to work with.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
Love this post.
Re: Love this post.
no subject
no subject
it all makes sense now. i kept asking myself, "where's the brontosaurus of my childhood!" when reading my son's dinosaur books.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
!!!
Re: !!!
Re: !!!
Re: !!!
Re: !!!
Re: !!!
Oh yeah?
Re: Oh yeah?
Re: Oh yeah?
Re: Oh yeah?
Re: Oh yeah?
Re: Oh yeah?
Re: Oh yeah?
Re: !!!
I'm too lazy to link the friggin picture
Re: I'm too lazy to link the friggin picture
Re: I'm too lazy to link the friggin picture
Re: I'm too lazy to link the friggin picture
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 12:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I'm too lazy to link the friggin picture
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 12:04 (UTC) - ExpandPS
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 12:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: PS
Re: PS
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 16:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: PS
Re: PS
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 16:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: PS
Re: PS
also also also
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 12:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: also also also
Re: also also also
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 17:00 (UTC) - Expandlike, totally omg
(Anonymous) - 2006-08-31 17:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: like, totally omg
Re: like, totally omg
Re: !!!
no subject
It's not like we've declared war on Pluto because it was a planet even though U.N. inspectors said it wasn't and then decided it really wasn't but kept sending troops there anyway.
It's just an amusing astronomical adjustment.
no subject
(no subject)
What about my
no subject
no subject
Re: What about my
I think they should have left it an honorary planet or something. You can't just snatch planethood like that!
no subject
Oops, I said that out loud (so to speak).
no subject
yeesh
no subject
someone posted a poem in
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
So, if I understand this correctly, Pluto got downgraded by the same mechanism that a rule change is voted on at a science-fiction convention. That's not so much about science as it is about the feelings of people who come to the business meeting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_redefinition_of_planet makes for entertaining reading on the topic. It doesn't include the post-vote comment by astronomer David Brown (in a USA Today article for which I can't find the link at the moment), who said that the new definition "brings magic back into the solar system."
no subject
People are weird.
(no subject)
Bring on the planets
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Our thoughts are like so sexily correlated on this issue, I get a shiver down my spine. And I think I am in love in that e-detached, I-promise-not-to-stalk-you sort of way.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject