Real anti-fascists
Jan. 19th, 2008 09:35 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As some idiot incoherently tries to sell a book arguing that liberals=progressives=communists=fascists and only right-wingers are really for freedom, let us take a moment to remember a real American anti-fascist. Let's also remember that the people who went to fight fascism in Spain, when many right-wingers and industrialists were cozying up to it, were hounded by the US government, labeled "pre-mature anti-fascists", and blacklisted or jailed.
Is there anyone more deserving of a (theoretical of course) punch in the face right now than Jonah Goldberg?
Feel free to make your nominations below.
Is there anyone more deserving of a (theoretical of course) punch in the face right now than Jonah Goldberg?
Feel free to make your nominations below.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:16 pm (UTC)I was just thinking, no, that's how Orwell envisioned it. I mean like, in his book. fucking moron.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-21 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 06:11 pm (UTC)No, I can't think of anyone who deserves more of a theoretical punch in the face. Though it'd be fun to hit to use the withered, empty shell of Suharto as a punching bag.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 06:35 pm (UTC)We have a nephew who shares his name with that idiot. I know I'm a bad aunt to say this, but it's turning me against the kid.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:22 pm (UTC)I thought Stewart was way too easy on him. though the line about "so you are upset with the overuse of the word fascism so you decided to write a book titled..." was funny.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 06:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:23 pm (UTC)I loved reading about your debate, btw. I forgot to comment.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 10:50 pm (UTC)I got plenty of fist
Date: 2008-01-19 06:56 pm (UTC)Re: I got plenty of fist
Date: 2008-01-19 07:24 pm (UTC)Re: I got plenty of fist
Date: 2008-01-20 09:39 am (UTC)It may be because the guests have to cross a picket line.
Re: I got plenty of fist
Date: 2008-01-27 09:37 pm (UTC)Re: I got plenty of fist
Date: 2008-01-28 03:06 am (UTC)To me the book and the interview seemed to be an attempt to deflect blame upwards, take revenge on the GOP officials who disowned him, make a little money, and possibly establish himself as a talking head on election tactics.
I don't have objective knowledge about whether he has repented or not, but come on. There is no chance that, going into this, he thought he was doing something good for the country. Check out this story. He's tried to suggest that he was pressured into doing it. Right. His firm was raking in millions and two other firms had turned away this job for ethical concerns. So he got $15,000 for the phone-jamming work, and, by the way, his profit on that was $13,100. Now that's he's out of jail, he's actually complaining that he can't get work in political consulting any more. Three months in prison isn't going to change a guy like that.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:11 pm (UTC)Thank you very, very much for linking to that SFGate article about Milton Wolff. We're not likely to read anything anytime soon to better exemplify the heroism ready within most of us.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:35 pm (UTC)Edit: I should have used this icon earlier. Consider this a replacement. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 09:03 pm (UTC)xxx
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 09:40 pm (UTC)If you have to punch someone, punch the guys who decide to run this kind of shit in major newspapers & on TV, treating Jonah & co. as serious thinkers, because of right-wing pressure or social connections or for the sake of "balance" or whyever they do it. There have always been guys like Jonah, and they've always been found their niche in fascist movements, but it used to be that before the takeover they were just cranks with a newsletter or something.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-20 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 11:01 pm (UTC)You already know who I'm gonna say.
Date: 2008-01-19 11:17 pm (UTC)And thanks for that text message.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-19 11:33 pm (UTC)How about a non-theoretical kick in the teeth?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-20 12:32 am (UTC)What Goldberg is serving up is pretty standard fare among right-wingers. Hitler was a fascist and socialist (after all Nazi's were "national socialists").
Also he's doing the old project of "rebranding" leftist terminology. That's how we get the current use of "politically correct" (some of oldsters remember the within the left use of that term) and "empowerment" zones from guys like Jack Kemp. Books with names like "Trashing the Planet" by Dixy Lee Ray which are actually anti-enviro books. Heck, Reagan's selective use of Thomas Paine's words for that matter (as noted on the latest Bill Moyer's Journal - and available online).
Talk about Orwellian! Right out of Orwell's essay on the English language.
George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language," 1946
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm
no subject
Date: 2008-01-20 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-20 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-22 05:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:43 pm (UTC)